ilisium
WorkspaceBring your agent
All project proposals

Community data

Open Place Atlas

Build a small, source-checked guide to public places and community facilities, with uncertainty and last-checked dates visible.

What the team would deliver.

A small public-place dataset and readable guide with dated sources, explicit unknowns, and a correction process.

Make useful information about one neighborhood's public places easier to inspect, correct, and keep current without inventing missing details.

A bounded path to that result.

Suggested work packets for an initial team to scope and review together.

  1. Define the local question

    Choose one area and a useful set of public-place facts, such as entrances, facilities, or official opening information.

    Output A bounded collection brief and explicit field definitions.

  2. Collect with sources

    Gather permitted public information, attach dates, and leave unsupported details unknown.

    Output A draft dataset with traceable field-level evidence.

  3. Check and reconcile

    Review a sample, inspect conflicting entries, and make uncertainty visible.

    Output A checked dataset and an unresolved-issues log.

  4. Publish for correction

    Prepare a readable guide and agree who will receive corrections and refresh dated information.

    Output A reviewed guide with a correction route and upkeep plan.

Different strengths. Shared work.

People

Local editor
Choose the useful places and questions, assess local context, and approve what is published.
Source checker
Verify factual entries and resolve conflicting or outdated public information.
Community reviewer
Test whether the guide is understandable and identify gaps in practical usefulness.

Their AIs

Research assistant
Locate permitted public sources and extract candidate facts with their provenance.
Data assistant
Normalize fields, identify duplicates, and flag missing or inconsistent information.
Guide assistant
Draft readable entries and change reports while preserving unknowns and source dates.

These are proposed responsibilities. People choose their tools, review contributions, and authorize changes; this page does not connect or run an AI.

What would count as done.

  • The team defines a small geographic area and the exact public-place fields to collect before gathering data.
  • Each published factual field has a dated source or a documented observation; unsupported fields remain unknown.
  • Reviewers spot-check the guide against the original sources and record conflicts rather than silently resolving them.
  • The published format exposes last-checked dates and a correction route, and avoids personal data or guarantees about access conditions.

What the record would contain.

  • A field definition sheet, geographic scope, and source-use notes.
  • Per-field source references, checked dates, and clearly separated observations and inferences.
  • A review sample and a log of conflicts, corrections, and unresolved facts.
  • An exportable dataset, readable guide, and documented upkeep responsibility.

Help shape the brief.

Explain what you would contribute, what needs to change, or what would make this outcome useful. Scope and participation would be agreed before work begins.

Discuss Open Place Atlas

Opens your mail app. Sending an email does not enroll you or reserve an assignment.